A Linguistic Study of News Values in the Press of Iran

Introduction:(F3) unambiguity
Every event which is reported in the news, has gone(F4) Meaningfulness
through some kind of "gatekeeping" process. How(F5) Consonance
does a journalist or an editor decide what is(F6) unexpectedness
newsworthy and what is not?(F7) continuity
According to some media researchers, they refer to(F8) composition
a set of so-called "News Values". These are the(F9) reference to elite nations
criteria which enable them to determine whether a(F10) reference to elite people
"News Story" is followed up in the first place and(F11) reference to persons
then whether it makes it in to the news, competing(F12) reference to something negative))
against all the other possible items.[Fowler, Language in the news, P:13]
News values are those professional codes used in theNow, Let’s have a more detailed look to each of
selection, construction and presentation of newsthese factors:
stories in corporately produced mainstream press and(F1): Fowler writes: "F1 says that an event is more
broadcasting.likely to be reported if its duration is close to the
News values are a result of the productive needs ofpublication frequency of the news medium. Because
industrialized news corporations. It is clear that peoplenewspapaers are generally published once a day, a
who work for such corporations will display mixedsingle event is more like to be reported than a long
ambitions, allegiances, politics and abilities as individuals.process", (Ibid).
Within the corporation they are subjected to anIn other words, frequency is the time-span of an
extensive division of labor. Beyond the corporationevent and the extent to which it fits the frequency
there are its competitors, and the occupationalof the newspaper’s or news broadcast’s
ideology of the journalist and the broadcastingschedule.
profession.(F2) Threshold means how big an event should be to
Within these contexts, news values operate tobe reported. Is an event big enough to make it in to
produce a standard product out of the contributionsthe news? That depends of course on news organ.
of all such people, practices and beliefs.(F3) How clear is the meaning of an event? The
Language, as the main material of news, is the mainmass media generally tend to go for closure, unlik
subject of linguistics so it is obvious that linguists areliterature, where the polysemy of events is exploited
eager to work on the process of broadcasting.and explored. As Fowller says: "unambiguity is
Recentely many of the well-known linguists such asself-explanatory though it must be added that
Noam Chomsky (1988), Roger Fowler (1991), Vanmysterious events, as well as clear ones, are
Dijke (1998), Allan, Bell (1991), Norman Faircloughnewsworthy if they can be related to cultural
(1992, 1995, 2003), Guy Cook (1992), Michael Hoeystereotypes."
(2001), Paul Chilton (2004) and Marina Sbisa (2005)(F4) By meaningfullness we mean how meaningful
… have been working on a so-called subject ofthe event will appear to the receivers of the news.
"language of the News" and the term "News Values"(F5) consonance means if the event match the
is of great importance.media’s expectations or not. Journalists have a
Edward S.Herman and Noam Chomsky (1988) in theirpretty good idea of the "angle" they want to report
pioneer book of "Manufacturing Consent" havean event from, even before they get there. It is said
mentioned five news filters and they believe thatthat if the media expect something to happen, then
these filters are now controlling all broadcastingit will.
process in the west. This research is going to(F6) if an event is highly unpredictable, then it is likely
introduce news values and especially twelve newsto make it into the news. The unpredictability does,
factors, mentioned by Johan Galtung and Mary Ruge,however, need to be within the confines of
which are the most famous list of news valuesmeaningfulness and unambiguity. Journalists say that
around the world and to see if these factors are"A man bites dog is news but a dog bites man is
working in Iranian press.not".
Theoretical Discussion:there is no suggestion, of(F7) once an event has been covered, it is
course, that journalists and editors refer to a listconvenient to cover it some more-the running story.
pinned on the wall of the office, but, rather, thatApart from anything else, it allows media
they unconsciously measure a potential news itemorganizations they already put in place to cover the
against these criteria. Numerous attempts have beenoriginal event. This will depend very much on the
made over the years to pin down news values morenature of event.
specifically. But it is hard to collate these into a hard(F8) composition is a matter of the balance of the
and fast list of values, because different studies havenews. It’s a matter of the editor’s
approached the whole idea from differentjudgement, more than anything else. If there’s a
standpoints, using different assumptions andlot of foreign news around, some of it will be
terminology. One of the best known lists of newsdropped in favour of more domestic news.
values is supplied by Johan Galtung and Marie Ruge.(F9) Reference to elite nations relates again to a
Any media analyst’s discussion of news valuescultural factor which is called "cultural proximity".
will always refer to their list, which was initiallyThose nations which are culturally closest to our own,
intended for the coverage of international events.will receive most attention and coverage. Some
Johan Galtung is a Norwegian professor who is seennations, formerly called super powers, are more
as the pioneer of " peace and conflict research" andimportant in terms of news coverage. In part, of
founded the PRIO-International Peace Researchcourse, this is conditioned by the fact that news
Institue in Oslo, Norway. He is also one of theorganizations will have reporters already stationed in
authors of the influential article named "the structureEuropean countries and in the USA so that when a
of foreign news" Published in Journal of Peacestory arises, there’s someone there to cover it.
Research in 1965. Roger Fowler (1991) believes that:(F10) It is a rule that the media pay attention to
"a widely accepted analysis of news values in theimportant people. Anyone the media pay attention
following list of criterial factors formulated by Galtungto, must be important.
and Ruge; they are worth studying in detail and in(F11) personalization connects with unambiguity and
particular. It is worth reflecting on the great extentmeaningfulness. Events are seen as the actions of
to which the factors are "cultural" rather thanindividuals.
"natural". The values they identified are:(F12) Bad news is good news. Bad news has many
(F1) frequencyof the other characteristics as well-it may be
(F2) thresholdunexpected, unambiguous, … .