Extension Education Reformation - I - New Reformation Models

Summary(Wani, 1992).
Technology akin to farming existing in an ecosystemTraining & visits on farm level failed but
need to be generated. It needs location specificfarmer-training & Farmer-research participation or
perfection and adoption. This could be possible bydemonstrations at farmers field did achieve a great
supporting KVK & Extension system with technologysuccess. With constraints of men and resources and
testing and refinement. Thus the whole discipline ofcrop insurance in vogue, we must induce researchers
Agricultural Extension need reforms. On the basis of ato have direct participatory research at farmer’s
broad review presented in this paper, followingdoors, on their fields. This venture can be on
recommendations could be deduced to reform andcost-sharing basis or with participatory involvement
fine tune technology generation, dissemination and itsof Industry. (SAMETI, Kashmir model refers). Proc.
delivery as an agri-pack end product.(APEP)XXI EECM,2008.
1. The base of discipline of Agriculture extension mayNew Approaches
be broaded to incorporate all disciplines, managementInsect-pest Management research could be an
tools and techniques. It is proposed to name itexample. Some FAO programme results are
“Farm Business Management”. It should beencouraging (Matteson, 2000). Rice IPM research
open to all agricultural & allied undergraduates. Themust incorporate farmer-training of farmers. New
course curriculum needs training and skill up-gradationpest management procedures are to be
of graduates and post-graduates in techniques likeexperimented under farmers field. Minimum use of
analysis of data, survey procedures, marketing,pesticide and eco-friendly application is preferred.
economics, rural sociology and farming systems etc.(Matteson, 2000).
2. Various reformation capsules like Chinese model,Problems and constraints of technology transfer in
African experiences, Dutch model, Netherland model,India have been reported, (Bairathi, 1998). Similarly
Isreal model, California model and Iranian models havebio-gas technology use or adoption has been full of
been reviewed. On the basis of these models a newconstraints detailed . (Prasad and Singh, 1999), these
model for technology delivery suitable to ourrange from technological, financial, administrative and
agro-eco-conditions has been postulated & named asinnovative ones. Proper mechanization and training in
Mohi-Model. Once we receive an acceptance for theoperation of such bio gas technology is necessary.
model, logistics and plans to execute it could beAn information web networking developed helped
formulated.farmers to improve their income through training and
Introductionadvise thus participatory technology transfer is a
Four paradigms of Agricultural extension consists ofpossible mechanism for improvement in
Technology transfer, prevalent since colonial times &Agri-productivity. (Warren, 2003)
later National Agriculture Extension Project (NAEP),Netherlands Model
reshaped in 1970-80 as Training and visit systemQuest for knowledge led Netherland farmers to have
across Asia. It involved top down approach. Its rolean association for organic farm produce. This
needs disdcussion. The second paradigm called asassociation conducted its own farm research and
Advisory work is what is present system ofshared its experiences with other farmer members
extension, where, government agencies, NGO andback in 1980. Soon they felt that their experiences
technical industries respond to farmers enquirieslacked experimental details. They approached Govt
which we call advisory role. The third paradigmagricultural Research Organization and started
consists of Human Resource Development. Thiscollaborating with them. The station mandate was to
innovation helped Europe and North America. Theassist the development of farming systems in the
Universities gave training to rural youth. It is thesearea called polder in the village Nagale of Netherland.
educated, trained youth which became futureThis combination of research and farming practices at
farmers in developed countries. What is known asfarmers field tried various crop combinations and
outreach system of colleges and universities is stillrotations. The use of nitrogen-fixing crops (Legumes)
unknown in our Agricultural Research system includingfor maintaining soil fertility and strategic management
State Agriculture Universities. A half hearted attemptof pests and diseases, extending or delaying planting
as Agri-business Agri-clinical is still to be backed withof various crops etc. Some experiences of
University, research, banking and economic support.low-weed-crop production by adopting agronomic
Is it which can help us to increase productivity in Indiapractices like regular harrowing of lands and use of
or Asia needs consideration ?.crop covers were tried. The farmer pressure and self
Technology adoption and impactsustaining groups need to be involved in research
The impact of National Agricultural Research Projectexperiments of SAU/ICAR and all other KVK farms
(NARP) (1986-92) revealed that , technologiesand institutes (Reinders, 2007). This would have both
generated were few and adoption rate was not high,a demonstration and high adoption value. Besides it
even then an estimated monetary benefit of Rs.2000would be a close to practical field research model
per hectare was observed.(PFRM).
Low relationship between technologies developed andHorizontal, farmer to farmer contacts help
adopted demands a mixed farming technologydissemination of agricultural information. This horizontal
capsule as 65% of our farmer’s are small andexpansion of information from one vegetable grower
marginal farmers. This needs a total shift to left into another in Suden. (Badri, 2001) helped technology
our agricultural extension methodology. (Reddy 2001).adoption.
T & V programme initiated with central assistance inMass media support for rice production has been
state has aroused all round technological awarenesshelpful in Bihar. Out of 5 TV talks, 75% farmers
among agricultural experts. Its dialogue andbenefited and registered higher production and low
technology transfer from University (Scientists) todisease damages. (1taque, 2000) similar observations
experts agricultural extension workers was nearlyare known in J&K. (Wani 2006). Electronic
total revolution. The (ZAREC) Zonal Agriculturaltechnological diffusion of knowledge at Farmer’s
advisory Research and Extension counseling was thefields was helpful, local language and local persons can
best plate form to discuss main issues impedingdiffuse ideas and disseminate information and
agricultural development. The missionary publication ofcommunication faster. It is proposed to have
production recommendations helps a lot in transfer ofinnovative knowledge defusion to women farmers
technology. The presentation of productionthrough local women (Rani and Reddy, 2002).
recommendations in local language is helpful inFarm – Women awareness Module
increasing productivity in many countries. (Wani,Majority of rice producing farmers in Kangra district
2004)of Himachal Pradesh had no extension personnel
Brinjal production technology adoption in Parbani,contact or electronic or print media information.
Mahrastra was the result of social participation, riskContinuous information on mass media have
management guarantee, marketing orientation,significant impact on use of seed rate, transplantation
information websites and communication methods.time and application of nitrogenous fertilizers in Rice
(Dudhak et al 2003).(Thusoo and Sohi, 2000). A gap existed in knowledge
Various limitation of transport, extension staff wereof farmers so far as dose of fertilizer application is
the reasons of poor productivity gains in Malakhandconcerned (Yadav and Singh, 2000).
agency of Pakistan. (Mohamad et al, 2003).Farm women adoption rate for use of farm
The adoption of legume production technologiesimplements was good when uses of such implements
under Jhodpur arid conditions was low. The problemswere demonstrated to them. (Sharma et al 2003).
as indicated by farmers were small farm size. SmallFarm women were given farm implements to use for
holder farmer was less interested to adopt thesea fortnight. Majority found them 78% profitable &
technologies. Non existence of market and pricing77% compatible. (Sharma and Sharma, 2002).
policy, risk of failure, feeding habits, social taboo andInformation from research to farmers via extension
lack of Post Harvest Technology (PHT) wereofficers was examined. The inter system
identified. (Yadev et al, 2003).communication helps in technology dissemination of
Proper guidance or information support was thedairy farmers in Iran (Rezvanfer, 2001). Rice
major constraint in adoption of improved Wheatcultivation awareness improved when women
cultivation in Himachal Pradesh. It contributed tofarmers were trained (Rama Krishnan and
16.8% non-adoption rate among farmers. OtherMahendram, 2003). Agricultural Knowledge and
contributory factors were technological unawarenessinformation system increased economic efficiency of
(13.33%) sloppy land (11.31%), farm input costcrop production, out put costs, social upgradation and
(9.41%), non availability of irrigation (8.29%) and lackincome generation (Carrasco et al, 2003).
of inputs (7.95%) (Puran chand et al, 2001).Extension Briefs – self help options (SHO)
Social Structure & Technology AdoptionSmall farmers are neglected by extension services
Schedule caste farmers in Maharastra have low leveland need proper awareness in Kurram (Haq et al
of rice technology adoption. Among 150 such farmers2004). Agricultural extension specialists must specialize
only 12.6% had high adoption rate (Mankar etin community structure, development , education
al,2004). Adoption of production recommendations oflearning tools, technology and policy issues. Thus
Cashew in Maharastra’s Sindhubrug district wasthese disciplines or topics need incorporation in Farm
58% (Bhairamkar et al, 2004). Motto of extensionBusiness Management curriculum.
programmes should be reach to unreached, teach toPartnership process, management and communication
un-teached, be known to unknown (Ganesan et al,should be the main thrust. Co-operative mechanism,
2003) (Wani, 1998). Agricultural productivity in Czchfarm business management and evaluation and
Republic increased when information andmonitoring tools should be used.
communication in extension system was improvedSeed production programme was successfully
for small scale farmers (Slavik, 2003).implemented by farm women as a self-help group in
A survey conducted among 120 farmers in KarnoolDindigul district of Tamil Nadu (Balasubramanian and
district, Andhra Pradesh, India, revealed thatThamizoli, 2003). Efficiency of extension lies in
education, social participation, scientific orientation, riskbottom up approach in hilly areas. Farmers interest
management, mass media exposure, economic andgroup awareness was most successful
market orientation were positively and significantly(Muhammad-Zafarullah 2003). Small scale farming
correlated with the extent of adoption ofoperations using green manure cover improved soil
recommended hybrid jowar (sorghum) seed practicesfertility. Participatory extension system helped more
by the farmers. Majority of the farmers (43.33%)adoption of technology in Uganda. (Miiro et al, 2002).
had a medium level of the adoption of theFarmers training and their own information networks
recommended practices. (Kumar et al, 2005). It ishelps small holder farmers. Topics including community
suggested that five categories of factors determineinvolvement, international multicultural projects,
the adoption of irrigation systems and are the keysleadership, learning strategies, new tools and
to designing relevant, effective and innovativetechnology, volunteer programme , programme
irrigation extension programmes amongdevelopment and evaluation, public policy issues,
horticulturalists. The five categories of factors are :youth education and partnerships needs introduction
Soil type and topography ; crop quality; sowing time;in Agri-Extension curricula (now proposed as Farm
saving water and crop yield (Kaine & Beswell, 2005).Business Management). Agriculture, natural resources
We in J&K under SREP Strategic Research extensionand health/nutrition shall form the basic of new
plan of Districts notice lack of information on sowingagri-farm-business extension system (Logan, 2004).
time, seed rate and fertilizer application in almost allThe word extension be replaced with “Farm
the crops. Seed treatment awareness helped farmersBusiness Management”.
to combat paddy blast (Wani, 2006, 2007).Administrative Bottlenecks
Innovative ChangeWhile the Nusa Tenggara Timur Provience is
Methodologies for analysis of farming system, optionssupposedly following the training and visit model,
for development & sustainable eco-friendly farmagricultural extension Workers receive very little
science technology are the needs of the hour. Wetraining. Other major constraints identified include
do have subject-matter-specialists, but the agentsconstant restructuring of the Agricultural Department,
for evaluating the composite effect of variouspoor remuneration, oppressive authority, inadequate
discipline oriented technology cover is yet to beinfrastructure, unclear job direction, geographical
structured. This is exactly where we should interveneconditions and bureaucracy. (Leta et al, 2005). This is
and restructure the discipline, programmes andthe reason of low technology revolution in rural India
divisions of extension education in the country. Infactand Asia too can be overcomed by transparent, NAR
a total change from existing slow action, lowSystem, which need renaming as National Farm utility
innovative, conventional and disintegrated extensionResearch and delivery system.
system has to be refined into analytic ,By combining biophysical science with social science, it
managemental , social, economical, marketableis possible to increase the impact of biophysical
system, so that the whole technology transfer couldscience findings at the farm level (Linehan et al,
be evaluated in terms of productivity and monetory2005).
gains per hectare. Different cropping and livestockIsreal Model
patterns and combinations need to be evaluated &General model of extension in SAU can be seen from
monitored. The impact analysis of wide range ofthe role of PAU, which needs a total reform. Should
Agricultural technology transfer be it training,we look for Isreal model. Isreal is characterized by
entrepreneurship or agri business is needed, bothtopographical variations and a wide range of soils,
before and after technology application.enabling the growing and raising of a variety of crops
The available research results have to pierce theand animals. A large increase in population immediately
farmers farming practices. Non - adoption is the resultafter 1948, required a rapid increase in food
of our low productivity levels per unit of land. Inspiteproduction, followed by development of research and
of tremendous yield gains the per unit profitability hasextension facilities and services. In recent years
not raised the economic conditions of our farmers.Isreal, like many other countries, has faced difficulties
Our farm economy still fluctuates betweenin continuing to supply the level of services it
season’s, rainy years and among regions. Nowpreviously provided. This difficulty led agricultural
for any widespread gains from technology, it isorganizations to begin assuming the responsibility of
essential to know its impact and adoptability rate. Itpartially financing extension for a few years, and later
is therefore necessary to develop new technologieson trying to reflect the cost onto the farmers.
after considering socio-organizational arrangements,Farmers are apparently willing to pay for on-farm
local existing soil, water, human needs and resources.extension visits. Under this system, the Flower Board
The local skills need to be known and refinement isis financing many public extension activities and
made to improve profitability. Our experience undercharging the farmer for partial costs of on-farm visits.
IVLP showed a net productivity gains of 2 q/hac inThis system operates successfully, aided by reports
rice production by improving local village driven plough.that are filed electronically by agents all over Isreal to
Similar innovative ideas local technologies withthe Floriculture Department Head Office, and from
improved or exotic one gave good results inthe Head Office to the Flower Board. Advantages of
development of profitable farming . (Wani,the new system are : a tremendous increase in
2004,2003, 2005,2006,2007).agent-to-farmer commitment; the professional level
Reform Capsulesof agents remains at least the same as before; and
(i) Chinese Modelthe financial situation of the majority of agents is
Chinese experiences needs a try under ourbetter than before . The disadvantage is that some
socio-economic conditions. The successfulfarmers are consuming less extension than before.
improvement of Sheep and Yak herds in china can be(Wolpson, 2005)
a good example for use in India. Under this projectGlobal Successful extension experiences
they first took stock of rangeland and livestockCalifornia Model
resources. Then socio-economic conditions of theCalifornia’s land grant extension progamme has
livestock breeders were analysed. Livestock andbeen successful in assisting agricultural Industries
pasture management by rodents was studied.develop as major world producers. Extension has
Rasngeland revegatation methods were tested andbeen a leader in facilitating quality-of-life and economic
propagated. Seeded fodders and effect of theseimprovements for rural communities throughout the
improved method of pasture development onstate. However, population explosion has transformed
disease control and profits from livestock wereCalifornia into an urban state, with changing societal
analysed. (Wagenin gem et al, 2001). Thus, theissues, values and priorities. Agricultural extension
extension education programmes should ensureprogrammes continue to directly serve a declining
facilitation of Farmer empowerment and notnumber of clientale that represent less than 1.5% of
dependence on subsidy. This means incorporatingthe population. Financial support for extension is
studies and programmes of Agri-livestock economics,decreasing at the country and state levels, thus such
grass land and rangeland management, crop and treemodels used by us in SAU could be catastrophic and
production in Agri-extension curricula.need change.
(ii) African ModelIranian Model
A new participating approach of clubbing local andIran is one of the world’s top ten horticultural
outside knowledge to solve the agricultural problem isproducers. However, post-harvest losses in Iran are
needed. Innovative approaches for soil and watersix times greater than the world average. Even after
conservation in Ethiopia and Tanzania were helpful. Aestablishing an agricultural extension Service, Iran still
new model of participatory modified Technologyexperiences great problems in reducing post-harvest
development approach is fast being recognized, aslosses (Jowkar, 2005). Results revealed that
the only way of clubbing traditional and moderneducation, material possession, mass media exposure,
technologies for agri-development . (Kib Wana et alextension contact, scientific orientation and risk
2000)preference were significantly and positively correlated
(iii) Dutch Modelwith the knowledge level of farmers pre- and post
The total reformation of agricultural technologytraining. (Malite et al , 2005.
transfer shall need refinement of elementaryIssues
methodologies used in extension consisting of PRA,Agricultural development programmes often produce
PERT or other specific managemental, communicationunexpected results. This can be attributed to the
and modern GIS- Geographic Information Systemfact that the target farmers already have their own
use. This would involve a total change in Extensionknowledge and competencies that determine their
Education, objectives, methodology & coursepractices. In order to be adopted, an innovation has
curriculum. We need agricultural networking forfirst to be discussed, and then appropriated by a local
bringing out results of transferable technologies.group of farmers in their system of knowledge and
Experimental learning and knowledge sharing has toin their system of meaning; subsequently the
be incorporated, as research on farmers field.innovation may be rejected or adopted by all the
Farmers have to be part of our learning andfarmers concerned (Mathieu, 2004).
experimentation process. Dutch model could be used.Problems
(Leeuwis, 2000) in India to ensure quick technologyThe findings also revealed that the attitudes of the
use. Let us evaluate technology use. It has beenrespondents were significantly and positively related
seen that some progressive farmers have awarenessto education, organizational membership, land holding,
of technology but being absentee farmers, theircontact with extension agent , mass media exposure,
workers have no knowledge or skills to use them insocio-economic status, awareness, income and
the field. Is it time to come out of “Technologymaterial possession. Lack of proper technical
dissemination Scenario” to “Technology Useknowledge, lack of irrigation facility and high cost of
Status in the field” and “Productivity gainfertilizers/chemical were indicated as the three most
assessment models” .important problems of the tribal farm women run
(iv) Mohi – Model – (Proposed Model)agriculture farms. (Bharali et al, 2004).
Experience learning, market designs, farm economics,New Vistas
sustainable agriculture, Agri-information,Agricultural extension is evolving world wide, and
communication skills and farm business shall be thethere is much emphasis today on community-based
knowledge bank available to Agri-Extension &mechanisms of dissemination in order to bring
communication experts, whom we should namesustainable change. The factors that make farmer
“FBM” – “Farm Business Managementgroups successful in disseminating information and
Experts”. The Extension Education is outdatedtechnologies need to be analyzed. A mixed
and too oftenly used and misunderstood phrase.methodology, multiple-stage approach was used to
Extension includes now every attempt toobtain data. Dairy-goat farmer groups (n=46) and
communicate with farmers. Today’s extensionindividual farmers (n=88) were interviewed. Factors
agencies can be university scientists, Subject matterthat were associated with group success in
specialists, Agri experts, farmers or even partially Agridissemination included member participation, degree
known NGO or their agents. Thus, the whole blameof jealousy within the group, homogeneity of
of others has to be shared by University experts.members, group capacity, number of linkages and
Agri-University, applied knowledge has to betype of group (Project-supported versus
communicated to farmers as “end product”non-supported). Some interventions that may
as pharmaceutical companies do. Thus all the currentincrease the success of groups in dissemination
“building block” , known knowledge has to beinclude capacity- building , increasing linkages with
computerized and stored. This has to be reshapedother extension stakeholders, providing an
and re-arranged as knowledge packs for innovativeenvironment for groups to form, using established
and whole farming capsules rather than onegroups (as compared to forming new groups), and
commodity knowledge sharing as in the west. We doencouraging groups to form around common
have commodity but not composite agricultureinterests rather than for other reasons. (Davis et al,
packages. A booklet on its composite effects has2004). Some methods in this direction are
been published as Broad Based Extension Educationdocumented (Wani,2008 a).