Only Way to Save Newspapers - Charge For the Web Site

You don't get free gas from a gas station. You don'tWhile papers have cut their editorial staffs not only
get free meals from a restaurant.to the bone but inside the bone, there's no excuse
You wouldn't walk into the Googleplex ... that'sfor them not coming up with a dynamite local news
Google's corporate headquarters in Mountain View,website. That's because they can reallocate the
Calif. and expect a staffer to rush to the lobby withstaffers who work in national or international news or
1,000 free shares of Google stock for you.other areas of the paper to the local effort. Go for it
At least we don't think so.... marshal all the resources into this one specialty.
So why is the newspaper industry the only one inLocal news, local features, local business, local sports,
America that is expected to give its product ... in itslocal commentary. If necessary, use "citizen
electronic version ... away for free?journalists" for neighborhood news. Cover the
Wrestling with that question will determine the fatecommunity top to bottom.
of this nation's newspapers.This is not only a financial and logistical advantage. It
Our answer: except for the "Big Four" nationalcreates a journalistic improvement, too, as news can
players, newspapers will not survive unless theybe instantly added and obsolete or inaccurate
1) convert out of print and totally into the Internet,information removed. The expertly crafted story or
2) confine themselves to local news and, mosthard-charging enterprise piece or beautiful set of
importantly,photographs can remain on the site for readers'
3) charge for it.enjoyment for a while instead of becoming
Astonishingly ... despite many erstwhile titans nowtomorrow's bird cage liner.
tottering on the brink of bankruptcy or outrightIn doing so, it would behoove the papers to play it
extinction ... we're talking about big ones like thestraight. Millions of readers have deserted them in
Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald,disgust over political agenda-driven reporting.
Rocky Mountain News, Chicago Sun-Times,Step 3: How much to charge? The Arkansas
Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Philadelphia Inquirer ... almostDemocrat-Gazette, one of the few if not the only
no one in the industry charges for their web sitesizable metro paper to charge for its web site,
product. Even as they swirl down the drain, they givemakes readers pay $4.95 a month. Since that's about
it away for free.16 cents a day, we'd say it's far too low. We'd make
"Giving away information for free on the Internetit a nice round number, easy to remember ... $20 a
while still charging 50 cents to $1 for the print versionmonth. That hopefully would bring in a substantial
of the paper was one of the most fundamentallyamount of revenue.
flawed business decisions of the past 25 years," saysReaders, of course, have become conditioned to
Prof. Paul J. MacArthur, who teaches public relationsfree content on the Internet. Many expect it, some
and journalism at Utica College. "Newspapers told theirstridently demand it. Can that habit be broken?
paying customers that the information truly had no"The only way you can charge online is if you have
value. They told their paying customers that theysomething so special that no one else can re-create
were suckers. Why would anyone pay 50 cents forit," says Paul Swider, a former St. Petersburg Times
something he or she can get for free? This poorlyreporter who also did a citizen journalist web site for
conceived and obviously flawed strategy has helpedthe paper. "Don't charge for national politics because
put the newspaper industry into its current financialthere's 1,000 other outlets to which the reader can
condition and hastened the demise of manyturn, so you're done. But if you have a synthesis or
publications."data or other unique quality of content that others
Step 1: Papers are being overwhelmed by enormouscan't duplicate, you could charge for it and succeed."
newsprint, production and delivery costs ... and a hugeThat means local news.
amount of staffing associated with them. All noAnd what of the current business model of
longer needed.newspapers ... the one that has them give content
Newspapers can still "deliver" their product ... insteadaway free on the Net in hopes of luring huge number
of being flipped from a speeding pickup truck at 4of readers and the attendant "page views" to lure
a.m. on or near a driveway, its content can beadvertisers. Well, if it works, why are so many
delivered electronically to a customer's computer orpapers failing?
to a portable wireless electronic reading device suchPapers should do both ... charge for their content and
as Amazon's Kindle.work hard to get advertising on the site. Wouldn't a
What's more, "content providers, once calledlot of advertisers prefer quality over quantity in
newspapers, are experimenting with on-demandreadership ... wouldn't potential business customers be
delivery particularly to mobile telephones," saysa lot more likely to be those who pay for the paper
Michael Ray Smith, communications professor atinstead of those who freeload?
Campbell University. "Telephones are computers andWalter E. Hussman Jr., publisher of the
computers make moving information moreDemocrat-Gazette, noted in an op-ed piece for the
convenient than ever. In some cases, informationWall Street Journal in 2007 that the U.S. newspaper
alerts and bursts can be downloaded from a sourceindustry collectively spends about $7 billion a year to
at work or home or even in transit and then readgather news. "By offering this news for free and
while on the road."selling it to aggregators like Google, Yahoo and MSN
Let's hope that papers have a heart and offer thefor a small fraction of what it costs to create it,
best severance packages and retraining possibilitiesnewspaper readership and circulation have declined,"
they can to their blue-collar workforce, many ofhe wrote. "Why would readers buy a newspaper
whom tend to be long-term, loyal employees.when they can get the same information online for
But obsolescence is obsolescence. Oh, yes, the fourfree?"
papers that probably can survive in print ... of courseHe added this point: ads have much more impact in
they're USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, the Newprint than on a computer screen. "While consumers
York Times and the Washington Post.often find pop-up ads a distraction (on a web site)
They're in the right place ... "I see New York andand banner ads as more clutter, readers often seek
Washington always having newspapers because theyout the advertising in newspapers."
are the seats of financial and political power," saysHussman's paper, incidentally, while not exactly
David E. Johnson, CEO of Strategic Vision, anflourishing, has suffered much less advertising and
influential public relations firm in D.C.circulation declines than most other of his peers.
They have a national base in their financial and/orWhich brings us back to our original question: why do
political reporting and an affluent readership thatpeople expect newspaper web sites to be free?
surely is strong enough to keep them going.And there's no good answer. The so-called experts
Step 2: Carve out a niche that makes the paper'suse airy, meaningless phrases like "because that's the
web site dominant, irreplaceable and one of a kind.Internet culture" as if this notion just floated down
"I would like to offer a two-word solution to thefrom heaven somehow.
financial woes of our ink-stained friends: 'local news,' "In fact, that's how Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who
says business consultant Jonathan Stark, who hasbenefits immensely from basically free news, views it.
consulted for a number of U.S. papers. "NewspapersIn an interview with Fortune's Adam Lashinsky, he
have real roots in the communities they serve. Theyactually said, "the culture of the Internet is that
have history, tradition and personal relationships. Ininformation wants to be free."
some cases, they are a source of local pride. IfInformation doesn't want to be free any more than
newspapers are willing to let go of their print-basedgasoline wants to be free or food wants to be free.
history, invest in their writers, embrace technologyWhen Mr. Schmidt stands in the lobby of the
and dedicate themselves to being THE source forGoogleplex and hands out free shares of his
local news, they will have readers for as long ascompany stock, then maybe we can believe the
people can read.""free" rationale. Until then, papers should charge for
Who else can do it better? Local TV station newswhat they do so they don't go out of business.
anchors and skimpy throwaway weekly papers can't.Simple as that.
They feed off the big local paper anyway.