Reinforcing Values through Socio-technical Systems

Socio-technical theory & Organizational Cultureproblems would be found to complain about.
Socio-Technical Systems (STS) is "concerned withDavid Haas (2003) who leads Collaborative Change
the interactions between the psychological and socialManagement team at the Altarum Institute,
factors and the needs and demands of the humanAlexandria, Virginia assisted the military in identifying
part of the organization, and its structural andthe critical factors for acquisition success. Of the top
technological requirements." (Szewczak, 2002, p. 107).ten critical factors for success, user involvement was
In organizational development, STS is an approach tonumber two second to executive support. (p. 12 -
complex organizational work design that recognizes13). One method of reducing the fear and resistance
the interaction between people and technology inis for leaders and followers to design the
workplaces. Initially, practitioners looked at optimizingsocio-technical systems simultaneously and jointly.
the requirements of technology with the needs of"Through faith we understand that the worlds were
humans. However, McLoughlin (1999) asserted "Theframed by the word of God, so that things which
chief lesson of the research was that if managementare seen were not made of things which do not
concentrated on maximizing their economic gains byappear." (Hebrews 11:3). Involving employees in the
improving the technological system of theacquisition process provides a sense of commitment
organization without similar attention to the socialand faithfulness to the organization.
system, then the economic benefits would be less."Empowerment
(p. 136). In the pursuit of economic efficiency, an STSAnother major impact for organizational management
approach must take into account both elements ascaused by the adoption of technology is integration.
well as how they affect the organizational culture.Although organizations have always been concerned
Organizational culture comprises the attitudes, values,about change management, the introduction of new
beliefs, norms and customs of an organization and istechnology significantly affects the breadth and
considered to be intangible and difficult to measure. Indepth of change. Sarmento (2005) asserted "One
describing organizational culutre, Trompenaars andmajor impact on the organization is on how they
Woolliams (2003) use the analogy of an onion thatmanage and control processes, relationships and
can be distinguished in three distinct layers (p. 25 -projects. The fundamental challenge to management
27). The first layer is the outer layer and consists ofis the need to implement the processes and
what people primarily associate with culture (i. e.infrastructure that support information management."
clothes, food, language, organizational charts, etc.)(p. 281). In order to be successful, organizations must
The second, and middle, layer refers to the normsundertake major changes that include changing
and values of an organization (i.e. right and wrong orexisting work processes and transitioning workers to
good and bad). Finally, the third layer is the deepestnew roles and skills. "A major concern of corporate
inner layer of the onion which is the level of implicitleaders and managers is how to effectively,
culture which results from human beings organizing toefficiently, and quickly transform an organization from
reconcile frequently occurring dilemmas (e.g. The dailyan older business design and model to one that is
routine of problem-solving).competitive and fully operational in the digital business
The Right Technology at the Right Timeworld." (Sarmento, 2005, p. 282). Leaders and
Davis (1997) observed that "The process begins withmanagers must function as fully informed change
a transformation of scientific thought, with newagents, anticipating the need for transformation and
perceptions about how the world works."(p. 147).carefully guiding the organization through
How often have you tried to contact customerimplementation of all the facets of new work
service of your local power company, or the helpparadigms. Oden (1999) suggested "Other things
desk of your Internet provider, or even ordered abeing equal, the greater the total degree of
pizza from pizza hut and found yourself annoyed byintegration or fit among the various components, the
the awkward recording? Every organization at somemore effective the organization will be." (p. 309).
point has to cope with the idea of 'the rightThe integration may be gradual or quick, narrowly or
technology, at the right time.' "[T]he technical aspectwidely focused, involve only internal components or
of needs for efficiency and economic return shouldextensively involve customers, suppliers and other
be viewed as interrelated with concern for theexternal entities. Major characteristics and processes
human aspect of every organization." (Wren, 2005, p.for successfully managing the transition include vision,
292).process reengineering, and architecture redesign
Understanding the Interrelationshipknowledge and skills.
Each organization has its own particular cultural"[Socio-technical] infrastructure is complex, requires
dynamics which vary in contexts, structures, andhigh levels of consistency and reliability, and often is
power relations. Any discussion of socio-technicalglobally implemented." (Sarmento, 2005, p. 283). For
change must also recognize an overarching set ofexample, employees must acquire new skill sets for
beliefs and assumptions about technology thatrapid development and implementation. Managers
informs the processes of adaptation. Technology isneed to understand the capabilities and limitations of
not 'merely' a collection of bits and pieces,new technologies and develop strategies for
components, or design elements. McLaughlin (1999)integration into existing administrative structures and
contends "[Technology] should be regarded as anpolicies.
ensemble, whose component parts and theirTechnological innovations by themselves introduce
composition are held together by social relationsnew challenges for leaders and followers. For
among people, as much as by more physical ties suchexample, using leader-follower integrated planning
as screws, bolts or electrons." (p. 2). The social andteams to develop administrative policies. Just as
technical systems must integrate and assist oneJesus empowered his disciples in Mark 6:7, "he gave
another.them power against unclean spirits" managers must
Reinforcing Organizational Valuesempower their followers by extensively involving
How do organizations use STS to reinforcethem in the integration process. Davis (1996)
organizational values? Organizations develop andasserted, "Manage the context, and let subordinates
employ technology in service of their mission, butmanage the content. And let them do the same -
also in service of their vision, values, and day-to-dayand so on down the hierarchy, until the technology of
operating requirements. Technology has the potentialthe new economy and the values of the new
to liberate people and processes to greatly enhancesociety together evolve into the network that is
creativity, performance, and quality, while reducingnow replacing the old order." (p. 122).
costs. Holman (2003) stated that "The reason for theAutonomous Teams
change will greatly affect its nature."(p. 333). As ourThe third area in which socio-technical systems
society focuses on technology development,reinforce values is in managing the system.
organizations are undergoing massive transformationsSocio-technical approaches include job enrichment as
to integrate technology into future operations. Humana design strategy and in addition emphasize worker
consideration in technological advances has a criticaland work group autonomy. When Jesus empowered
area in this transformation. "When any newhis disciples in Mark 6:7, he also sent them out in
technology is introduced, it is important that the userautonomous teams "by two and two". The purpose
population have a positive attitude towards the newof going out in pairs may have been to bolster
technology. For it to be successful, any newcredibility by having the testimony of more than one
technology needs to be understood and valued bywitness, as well as to provide mutual support during
the users. (Szewczak, 2002, p. 108).their training period but he gave them, knowledge,
The users of this new technology, from anpower, and autonomy. Oden (1999) argued "Sub-units
organizational context, are bound together byand teams should be relatively autonomous in
organizational culture which provides them with acomparison to previous organizational eras."(p. 236).
common viewpoint, shared beliefs, or values. TheseRather than providing traditional supervision,
values help them understand the activities of otherstechnology will allow managers to coach, assist with
in the organization, and it guides their own activitiesproblem solving, and provide linkage to top
within and on behalf of the organization. "Because themanagement, to other organizational units, and to
shared beliefs include values about what is desirableother organizations. Upper management should simply
and undesirable how things should and should not be,set goals, supply resources and manages the culture.
they dictate the kinds of activities that are legitimate"When workers were asked to suggest changes to
and the kinds that are illegitimate." (McLaughlin, 1999,the way in which their work was organized, the
p. 67). When followers participate in the embeddingresult was the setting up of autonomous work
of technology, their values are also rooted in thegroups, individuals taking on more varied job tasks,
resulting socio-technical organization. Embeddingand a flattened management hierarchy." (Chmiel,
technology occurs in three major areas. Leaders can1998, p. 114). The effectiveness of technology
build commitment during the acquisition of technology.depends in part on suitable ways of organizing
During the integration of technology into theworkers to use it.
organizational culture leaders can inspireReferences
empowerment. And through the proper managementChmiel, Nik. (1998). Jobs, Technology & People.
of the resulting socio-technical systems leaders canFlorence, KY. Routledge.
encourage teamwork and autonomy.Davis, Stan (1996). Future Perfect. Reading, MA.
CommitmentAddison-Wesley Books.
Why do people complain about new technology?Haas, David (2003). Government-wide Information
Technology acquisition is the process by which aTechnology (IT) Acquisitions. Increasing Likelihood of
company acquires the rights to use and exploit aSuccess Through Leadership and Integrated Planning
technology for the purpose of improving workTeams Development. Alexandria, VA. Altarum.
processes, products, or services. From the top-downRetrieved Electronically January 28, 2006.
view, managers fear the loss of control. ManagersHolman, David (2003). The New Workplace: A Guide
desire new technology to increase production andto the Human Impact of Modern Working Practices.
maintain control but during introduction they discoverHoboken, N.J. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.(UK), 2003.
flaws such as poorly defined requirements and userHoly Bible (1999). King James Version. Study Bible.
dissatisfaction. Yates and Maanen (2001) maintainedGrand Rapids, MI.
that managerial assumptions regarding control areMcLaughlin, Janice. (1999). Valuing Technology:
incorrect and relationships between workers,Organizations Culture and Change.
supervisors, and top management are frequentlyLondon, GBR. Routledge.
altered by new technologies. (p. 207). Beekman andMcLoughlin, Ian. (1999). Creative Technological Change:
Quinn (2006) discussed how technology contributesThe Shaping of Technology and Organizations.
to organizational culture by providing: "flatter"London, UK: Routledge.
hierarchies, making it easier for workers at differentOden, Howard W. (1999). Transforming the
levels to communicate; "increased integration" soOrganization: A Socio-Technical Approach. Westport,
departments can communicate openly; and "increasedCT. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
flexibility" allowing businesses to quickly react toSarmento, Anabela (2005). Issues of Human
changes. (p. 429-430).Computer Interaction. Hershey, PA. IRM Press.
From the bottom-up view the simple answer to whySzewczak, Edward J.(Editor). (2002). Managing the
people complain about technology may simply beHuman Side of Information Technology: Challenges
because they disapprove of the change itself. Peopleand Solutions. Hershey, PA. Idea Group Publishing.
at all levels tend to resist change when they don'tTrompenaars, Fon and Woolliams, Peter (2003).
clearly understand the motivations behind theBusiness Across Cultures. West Sussex, England, UK.
changes. Yates and Maanen (2001) discussed aCapstone Publishing.
"culture of complaint" which results from cynicism andYates, JoAnne and Maanen, John V. (2001).
negative attitudes toward organizational changes. (p.Information Technology and Organizational
174 - 175). The notion is that even if the currentTransformation. History, Rhetoric, and Practice.
problems with technology were solved, otherThousands Oaks, CA. Sage Publications, Inc.