Should Stem Cell Research Be Allowed

Stem cell research has been at the forefront ofresearch is not intended to provide medical benefits
many ethical debates in recent years. The manners into the donors" and "a decision to donate or not to
which the cells must be harvested and their usagedonate will not affect future medical care" (NBAC
for advancement in biomedical research along withreport 4). In addition to that the commission
the use of federal funds to finance the ongoingrecommends that in federally funded research, the
research has proven to be a debate that is not easilyresearchers "may not promise donors that stem cells
resolved even with the revolutionary advances in thederived from their embryos will be used to treat
treatment and prevention of disease, injury and birthpatients specified by the donors (NBAC report 5) and
defects. Although the benefits of continuing work onrecommendation seven states, "Embryos and fetal
stem cell research sometimes outweigh its costs thetissues should not be bought or sold" (NBAC report
final judgment for this issue should be that stem cell5). The commission's recommendations eight through
research should not be allowed due to severalthirteen deal with the formation of different
reasons.committees, subcommittees, as well as watch dog
Many of those who oppose ongoing research do sogroups to oversee funding and ethics (NBAC report
because of a religious stand point regarding life and6). The NBAC concluded that it would be acceptable
how much respect an embryo should be awarded.for the federal government to fund research of both
Yet, many of those same individuals acknowledgetypes of stem cells. They came to these
and approve of in vitro fertilization (the implantationrecommendations only if certain guidelines as well as
of a human embryo created in a Petri dish) for thosesafeguards are in place. They did, however,
who are genetically incapable of having children. Whorecommend not funding any project that created
gets to decide when religious bounds have beenembryos just for research.
crossed and to which religion in the scientificSeveral months after the commission presented their
community do we allow these bounds to befindings to the senate subcommittee, it was signed
standardized upon? The United States Policy oninto law. President Clinton also approved these new
human stem cell research as articulated by Presidentlaws. These laws remained in effect until several
Bush on August 9, 2001 is as follows: Permits federalmonths ago when President Bush changed many of
funding only for research using cells fromthe laws already in affect. As the election of
approximately 60 stem cell lines identified by thePresident Bush was confirmed, many of those in the
National Institute of Health as having been derivedscientific field waited in silence. These scientists were
from excess human embryos prior to the August 9waiting for the president's decision on stem cell
announcement. There is currently no federal law orresearch. While these scientists waited, a country
policy prohibiting the private sector from creatingthat dominated the biotech world was falling behind.
stem cells by in vitro fertilization or by the SCNTThe US had up until this point conduced up to 90%
technique for the purpose of research. The policy ofof the world's biomedical research, and US federal
most individual states also permits private funding fordollars and private spending exceeded that of the
the use of embryonic stem cells for the purpose ofrest of the world put together (Capell 1). After
research, although a few states have banned thePresident Bush announced that federal funding would
continuation of research techniques.be cut for stem cell research, the United States
While there is much hope and promise in this researchstarted its decline. How much the US started to fall
there are many things that need to be understoodback wasn't clear until several weeks later. The
first. First an understanding of what causes a stemrealization came when the National Institutes of
cell to replicate and become a specialized cell needsHealth announced that 48 of the 64 stem cell lines
to be known. Scientists need to know this beforeavailable for funding were in labs outside the US.
they can tell that cell what it must become. AnotherThere are several reasons for larger lines of stem
obstacle that must be overcome is the possibility ofcells outside the United States. First, in other
immune system rejection. If stem cells are used fromcountries there are fewer restrictions on stem cell
a donor the recipient's immune system may rejectresearch. Second, there is more funding available for
and even kill the new healthy stem cells. Sciencethis type of research (Capell 1). With the
would have to find a way to stop this rejection priorannouncement that came on the ninth of August,
to the use of donor stem cells (National Institutes ofmany things changed. Stem cell research in the
Health 2). Many guidelines and safeties need to beprivate sector is now unregulated. This should cause
put into place by the federal government before anyconcern for many people. With the privatization of
type of research can go forward. President Clintonresearch come many different problems. One of the
and his administration realized this need forfirst problems we may see is patenting of stem cells.
government control over stem cell research andAs large companies buy up the embryos available the
issued a letter on November 14,1998 to the chairmanprice of research will increase (Capell 2). According to
of the National Bioethics Advisory Commissionan article that appeared in Business Week as
(NBAC), James Childress, Ph.D. In this letter to Dr.research costs rise so will the end cost to the
Childress President Clinton asked the NBAC toconsumer (Capell 3). By deregulating stem cell
"undertake a through review of the issues associatedresearch, the president has taken control of cost and
with ... human stem cell research, balancing all ethicalmonopolization from the government and given it to
and medical considerations" (Childress 2).the big corporate companies. President Bush, in his
It was from that time until September of 1999, whenstatement to the nation stated he had taken all facts
the commission submitted its report, that theinto consideration before making his decision. But yet
commission spent most of its time investigating thehe still favored the cutting of funding. The president's
issues associated with stem cell research. Thereason for cutting this funding was because it is
commission believed that it was important to get asmorally wrong. He also stated that it goes against his
clear a picture as possible on both the ethical andbeliefs. President Bush's reasons for cutting this
scientific issues surrounding stem cell research. Thefunding seem to conflict a precedent long set in this
commission first held meetings with Dr. Gearhart andcountry to keep the state separate from the church.
Dr. Thomson as well as several other scientistsThese are most obvious in the ruling of Roe vs.
involved with stem cell research. After theseWade, and the ruling of no prayer in public schools.
meetings it became very clear to the commissionYet in the case of stem cell research that doesn't
why stem cell research had generated so muchseem so. The most prominent opposition to this
interest. The interest was in the use of human stemresearch is the Catholic Church. Pope John Paul II,
cells to treat possibly every disease and disorderwrote, "It is immoral to produce human embryos
known to humans. As well as being beneficial to thedestined to be exploited as disposable biological
advancement of new drugs. The commission didmatter" (Paul II 1).
realize however that this research raised seriousThe Catholic Church has always believed that life
ethical concerns. These concerns involved the twobegins at conception, or the very moment an egg is
sources of stem cells, fetal tissues from electivefertilized. This is why the church has always opposed
abortions as well as surplus embryos obtained fromstem cell research, and with good reason, they
fertility clinics. Realizing its need to explore the ethicalbelieve it destroys human life. Even with the
issues involved with stem cell research thepresident's decision to limit the funding it has still
commission convened again. This time the meetingupset the pro-life groups. President Bush's option to
was held at Georgetown University. The topic waslimit funding for stem cell research not only upset
religious perspectives relating to human stem cellpro-life groups but also religious leaders and many
research. Altogether eleven scholars in Romanscientists. Several of these scientists have fled to
Catholic, Jewish, Eastern Orthodox, Islamic, andGreat Britain, which has fewer restrictions on stem
Protestant traditions presented formal testimony tocell research (Capell 3). For this reason it is believed
the commission. At this meeting as Drenkhahn 6 wellthat many more scientists and researchers will leave
as all the others held by the commission the publicfor Great Britain. Meanwhile, the president's decision
was invited and encouraged to speak. After theleft abortion opponents engaged and trying to
meeting, it was obvious to the commission that theredefend one of their most basic beliefs that life starts
were many different perspectives about research onat the moment of conception. They believe that this
both the fetal tissues and human embryos (NBACembryo is entitled to the same rights a grown person
report 3).is allowed (Mitchell 1). The president's statement of
The commission did find an agreement from all"its ok to experiment on embryos that were
parties involved in the meetings that "humandestroyed before Aug. 9th" was compared to be as
embryos deserve respect as a form of human life"moral as selling the gold teeth of Holocaust victims;
(NBAC report 90). They also found though that manyafter all they are already dead. (Mitchell 2)
of the groups disagreed as to what form of respectBush says his stem cell policy won't change, and he
and type of protection the embryos should get.promises to veto any legislation that would allow
Many in the group did think that the sources forfunding on new cell lines (Weiss 2). This hard line
stem cells should not be used unless absolutelyapproach to stem cells will only cause the United
necessary. In the end though the commission wasStates to fall further behind in this area of
able to come up with thirteen differentbioresearch. "Should the US stop funding this
recommendations for both the president and theresearch, it will seriously and adversely affect the
senate subcommittee, the final plan as to thisprospects for human health for the next 100 years,"
research was produced. Recommendations oneaccording to William A. Haseline, CEO of Human
through seven are the most important. TheseGenome Sciences Inc. and a renowned biotech
recommendations deal with the funding, ethics andresearcher. If funding stopped the United States
guideline need for stem cell research. The firstwould lose more then its leadership position (Capell 3).
recommendation that is made regards funding ofContrary to the statements made by the president,
fetal tissue stem cell research. The commission foundmembers of congress said they would sponsor a bill
that it is acceptable for the government to fund fetalexpanding research. At this time though it looks like
tissue research, as long as the choice of abortionno new bills will be introduced this year, which will
was independent and not for the sole purpose ofallow scientists to start working under the new rules.
research (NBAC report 3). The secondMost people are convinced that President Bush will
recommendation pertains to funding of embryonicnot keep his current position on stem cell research.
research. The commission found that it is acceptableThey believe that whether the current lines of stem
for the government to fund embryonic cell research,cells are successful or not, pressure to expand the
as long as the embryos are surplus embryos leftline will be intense. This pressure will not only come
over from fertility treatments. The commission alsofrom his opponents but from some members of his
recommended new regulations and statutes for theown part. The fear remains, however that this sort
ethics involved in this research.of research will inevitable lead to human cloning and
The next two recommendations made by thethe creation of designer children. Many ethical
commission covered the creation of stem cells fordecisions must be made on this issue before any
research purposes only. The commissioncompromises can be made. Therefore taking into
recommended that the federal government not fundaccount the experience that we already have
any project that deliberately creates embryonic stemconcerning most of the technological advancements
cells for research purposes only (NBAC report 5). Thisthat lead to ozone depletion and many other
research includes both invetro fertilization or by aenvironmental problems we should not continue with
process called somatic cell nuclear transfer cloningthese experiments in order to think of better future
(NBAC report 5). Both recommendations five and sixfor our children. Most of the cases when humans
deal with specific disclosure information. Thisinteract with regular flow of nature and environment
information is intended for those who are willing tohumans do not get in full what they expected and
donate surplus embryos. The commissionthe issue of pro's and con's is highly controversial.
recommends that donors be advised "stem cell