The Effect of Technology Advances on Urban Structure and Economic Activity

Cities exist to make our communication and economicflattening of the bid rent curves for firms and
exchange easier.  The dense concentration ofhouseholds as the importance of transportation costs
people and firms within cities lowers the cost ofand direct communication is reduced.
trading, as the market is easily accessible to the firmAlternatively, the regional restructuring perspective
and vice versa, firms have access to an extensiveputs the emphasis on firms' decisions rather than
labour market and workers can find employment. worker' residential preferences, it emphasises the
People and firms locate in cities because it reducesimportance of businesses following outsourcing
their transport costs either to take goods to marketstrategies.  Firms selectively relocate employment to
or to travel in order to buy goods (Ioannides et al.the urban periphery, cities further down the urban
2007).  Cities that have been easier to transportperiphery or internationally.
goods to have often been the most successful, forThe increase in demand for interaction and faster
example, many of the major cities in Europe aremobility, new business practices such as Just In Time
ports.  This concentration of factors necessary forordering and the casualization of work, through
trade can also be seen to occur within cities.  Theincreasingly contract based and part time
monocentric model shows that cities tend to radiateemployment, enabled by the development of
out from a central point dominated by commerce,computer technology have led to increased traffic
this is because the centre of the city is wherethrough commuting, travel and freight (Audirac,
access to the market is easiest and transport costs2005).  This has meant that many major cities have
are lowest.  This can be shown using simple bid rentexperienced traffic and congestion problems causing
curves.  We assume that firms will bid more tofirms situated within the city to re-locate to urban
locate in or close to the CBD than households.peripheries in order to benefit from improved
This means that firms will occupy the centre whileconnectivity.
other uses such as housing are located further fromSo why do agglomerations of firms and employment
the centre.  The monocentric model assumes that ifoccur on the periphery?  Castells (2002) believes
transport costs are lower then firms will locatethat firms locate in areas in which they have the best
further from the centre, therefore employment willaccess to other businesses and cities in international
not be as intensely concentrated in urban centres.networks, this means they have to locate near to
There has been rapid technological development inmotorways and airports which are often located in
Information and Communication Technology (ICT)urban peripheries.  It is also necessary for firms to
over the last twenty years which has impacted onattract highly educated employees, they do this by
many areas of modern life (Castells, 2002).  Cominlocating in attractive areas, often outside of cities,
and Hobijin (2004) illustrate this development usingbut close enough that their employees can access
data on changes in personal computer and cell phonethe benefits of the city or in gentrified suburbs.  On
ownership, the EU went from less than 5 million PCsthe other hand, Storper (1997) believes that firms
in the early 1980s to 100 million in the late 1990s andhave “untraded interdependencies” such as
nearly no cell phones to more than 150 million. Howtacit knowledge.  This is particularly important in the
has this technological development, dramaticallycomputer technology industry and other young
reducing  communication and transportation costs asindustries as firms get distinct benefits from working
well as leading to the development of new industries,in an environment where they can share knowledge
affected employment location in cities?to solve problems.
Taking the monocentric model's assumptions to theirThe emergence of new factors which mean that
logical conclusions it could be argued that computersome firms are more attracted to peripheries of
technology spells the end of cities as the spatialcities means that the appearance of the firms bid
scope of knowledge spillovers is expanded so thatrent curve will change.  Firms which have not been
less one on one interaction is needed.  Employmentas affected by computer technology advances are
will be spread over a larger distance as firms locatelikely to retain bid rent curves favouring centres but
more evenly in space to take advantage of lowerfirms attracted to the periphery will have bid rent
rents and congestion costs (Ioannides et al. 2007) curves that have firms clustering at the centre as
Ioannides et al. write that “Such changes couldwell as on the periphery.
lead us to predict the death of distance.  That is, toReferences and Suggested Readings
suggest that location will no longer matter and thatIoannides, Y., Overman, H., Esteban, R. and
economic activity will, in the near future, be evenlySchmidheiny, K. (May 30, 2007) The Effect of
distributed across space” (2007, pp.2).  ThisInformation and Communication Technologies on
argument was refuted  by Gasper and GlaeserUrban Structure, Preliminary version of a paper
(1996) who argued that although technology willprepared for the 46th Panel Meeting of Economic
replace the need for some personal interactions, thePolicy in Lisbon, October 2007
main effect of ICT will be to increase the demandCastells, M. (2002) An Introduction to the Information
for personal as well as virtual interactions and that farAge in The Blackwell City Reader, ed. Bridge, G. and
from leading to dispersal the new technologyWatson, S. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.125-134
industries were creating their own clusters in areasComin, D. and Hobijin, B. (2004) Cross Country
such as Silicon valley.Technological Adoption: Making the Theories Face the
Audirac (2005) identifies two main strands of thoughtFacts.  Journal of Monetary Economics, Gasper, J.
on the effects of ICT on urban form: the urbanand Glaeser, E. (1996) Information technology and the
deconcentration and regional restructuring researchfuture of cities. Wroking paper 5562. Cambridge. MA:
traditions.  The urban deconcentration perspectiveNational Bureau of Economic Research
argues that residential preferences for low densityAudirac, I. (2005) Information Technology and Urban
living, along with rising affluence and ICT advances,Form: Challenges to Smart Growth. International
mean that cities will experience decentralization whichRegional Science Review, 28, 2, pp.119-145
disperses employment and population to theStorper, M. (1997) The Regional World: Territorial
metropolitan edge as well as to places further downDevelopment in a World Economy.
the urban hierarchy.  This would be equivalent to a