The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

Technology has linked its way into just about every(CMS) software - even though there's no doubt that
facet of human lifestyles. For your edification, thisit can help firms deliver faster, better, and cheaper
continuing discussion, as well as an addition toservices to their clients. Several observers suggest
previous study formats. In offering this informationalthat the initial threshold of setting up a management
passage, the legal system is just one moresystem intimidates firms. A software consultant, Tom
profession that has been conquered by technology.O'Connor said, "Everybody loves technology but
We are aware of the court stenographers and PC'shates installing it."
that record and track our legal system, but whatProject Management has not been a topic stressed in
about the C.G.A. System? The Computer Generatedmany schools, according to an independent IT
Animation Presentation can be admitted into ourconsultant from Minneapolis. A successful project
American Court System. Admissible Evidence inmanagement is dependent upon a large network of
criminal trial(s) has been recorded as a precedentpersonnel. An effective Electronic Data Discovery
case ruled on by the Supreme Court. As reported by(EDD) Project Network includes: clients, partners, legal
Asher Hawkins, of the Legal Intelligencer, differingIT staff, associates, paralegals, inside counsel, service
arguments by six Pennsylvania Supreme Courtproviders, and technical experts. Without a doubt, the
Justices concluded that a Lackawana Common Pleasuse of (PM) Project Management to mitigate risk
Judge properly admitted the use of CGA during awhile delivering consistent, quality results that
first-degree murder case in 2002. CGA has beenrepresents significant benchmark(s) in the maturing
portrayed on various television shows such as CSIprocess of the EDD environment.
Investigation(s) and Crime 360.Used in many corporations to increase productivity,
Justice Sandra Schultz Newman wrote, "Society hasquality control programs such as Sigma Six, have
become increasingly dependent upon computers inbeen generating interest. Understanding why and
business and our personal lives..." She went on thewhere problems occur has a great impact on the
say, "With each technological advancement, thedecrease in mistakes. The application of these
practice of law becomes more sophisticated andprinciples and practices on Electronic Data Discovery
commensurate with the need to shed any technoprocesses improve a lawyer(s) result(s) with
phobia and become more willing to embrace theincreased quality and decreased costs. Reasons for
advances that have the ability to enhance therising interest in Project Management are recognition
efficiency of the legal system."in the success depends on effective management.
Prosecutorial teams, including Forensic PathologistsMitigating risk and lowering cost by applying
and Crime Scene Reconstructionists presented a"Electronic Discovery Techniques" offered a myriad
murder case to the jury; the prosecutor's version...theof considerations, for example, matching time tables,
defendant did not possess and/or have access tosecuring outside IT experts, propose and follow
this tool. One argument against this procedure in"E-Discovery" protocol, engagement of a special
court is of a defendant, a poor person, is able tomaster to monitor compliance and resolvement of
commission an equivalent production. In other words,disputes, use of checklist(s) containing critical steps
would the defense be able to match the expensesand reminders for every step in and of a project,
associated with the prosecutions presentation to theworking service providers, working with attorneys to
court? Another justice suggested it would be wiserfind answers to the right questions, as managing
to exclude CGA evidence if an indigent or poorvendors require special attention to service level
defendant could not afford the costs of "equivalentagreements (SLA'a).
production." The basic cost could be upwards ofMeanwhile, discover these definitions/terms of legal
$20,000.00. Another legal professional commented onjargon that may help you in your administration,
whether the cost(s) of CGA was worth thebusiness, everyday life, and tech studies:
expenditure. The justices also took note on the factSubrogation - any right a creditor has against a
that CGA's are becoming increasingly less expensivedebtor now becomes the right of surety. Inclusive
to produce and could be a vital tool in the rapidare creditor rights in bankruptcy, rights to collateral
expedition of court cases. In any case, pre-trialpossession by the creditor, and rights to judgments
motions that include CGA evidence should be treatedsecured by the creditor - the surety now stands in
with respect. Jury instructions and indigent (lackingthe shoes of the creditor against the debtor.
food, clothing, and other necessities of life becauseIndemnification - The right to pursue guaranteed
of poverty; needy; poor; impoverished, destitute)reimbursement/payment to a director for legal costs,
defendants are needed with the court's permissionfees, and/or judgments involved in defending
for the presenting of such evidence.corporations - (clients) related law suits. Simply put
The judges position was to make certain thatthe right to compensation for services as directors
Computer Generated Animation was fair and(representatives/attorneys).
accurate while permitting defendants an opportunityHabeas Corpus - held against your will - against your
to challenge its foundation. It has also been noted byconstitutional right(s), a writ requiring a person to be
the justices, to make clear to the jury that it wasbrought before a judge or court, esp. for
not meant as a re-enactment or simulation, butinvestigation of a restraint of the person's liberty,
merely an expression of opinions formulated byused as a protection against illegal imprisonment, one
expert witnesses. Another justice stated hisof a variety of writs that may be issued to bring a
position..."I think it's a valuable tool, but a tool thatparty before a court or judge, having as its function
needs to be used sparingly. I don't think it'sthe release of the party from unlawful restraint.
necessary in every case." Newman also wrote, "TheWrit - a legal order, a document of the court.
difference is one of mode, the law does not, andTort - personal injury, a civil wrong not arising from a
should not; prohibit proficient professionalbreach of contract...a breach of a legal duty that
employment of new technology in the court-room.proximately causes harm or injury to another.
This is, after all, the 21st century."Posterity - the offspring of one progenitor to the
Each state has its own court system. There's also afurthest generation; descendants; all future
system of federal courts. Decisions made duringgenerations; succeeding or future generations
adjudication by federal administration agencies maycollectively; Judgment of this age must be left to
be appealed to a federal court. Similarly, decisionsposterity; all descendants of one person.
made by state administrative agencies may beHIPPA - The Health Insurance Portability and
appealed to a state court. The definition forAccountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) was enacted to
adjudication (adjudicate) is to render a judicial decision.ensure that personal information stored, accessed or
In the administrative process, the proceeding in whichprocessed adheres to a set of guidelines or "security
and administrative law judge hears and decides onrules." These rules outline security measures that
issues that arise when an administrative agencyshould be implemented to adequately secure all
charges a person or a firm with violating the law orelectronic protected health information (EPHI).
regulations enforced by the agency. An administrativeLogRhythm directly meets some HIPAA
agency is a state or federal government agencyrequirements, reduces the cost of complying with
established to perform a specific function.others, and it features out-of-the box HIPAA
Administrative agencies are authorized by legislativereporting packages.
acts to make and enforce rules to administer andSOX - require public companies to create, monitor,
enforce the acts.and manage controls over many aspects of their
Typically, a state court system will include severalfinancial reporting. Some companies have found that
levels, or tiers, of courts - (a) trial courts of limitedsuch transparency doesn't come easily. The rules
jurisdiction, (b) trail courts of general jurisdiction, (c)require not only new processes, but also fresh tools
appellate courts, and (d) the states highest courtthat can determine whether systems and reporting
(often referred to as the State Supreme Court).standards are up to snuff. In general, SOX
Anyone who is party to a lawsuit has theapplications can be classified into three main market
opportunity, and/or right, to plead his/her casesegments, according to Forrester Research. Those in
before a trial court and then if he/she loses, beforethe enterprise-application space include Oracle and
at least one level of appellate court. Furthermore, if aSAP; IBM and Stellent fall under the
federal statute of federal constitutional issue isenterprise-content management (ECM) heading; and
involved in the decision of the State Supreme Court,OpenPages and Paisley Consulting are considered
that decision may be further appealed to the Unitedspecialists, competing with Certus, HandySoft, and
States Supreme Court.other pure-play vendors.
Have you ever wondered, with all the juris prudenceWhere is it that technology hasn't reached? Are the
(the science or philosophy of law, a body or systemcourtrooms truly behind in technology? Are they out
of laws, a department of law, Civil Law. decisions ofof the loop as are many "non-techie" or poor people
courts, esp. of reviewing tribunals) activities floodingare? The "Great Technical Divide"...go figure!
the land, how could the legal system function withoutAfter all, this is the 21st century.
technology?Til next time...by
Monica Bay, of Law Technology News, reported ofGregory V. Boulware
lawyers at small firms, especially solo practioners,3.16.
have resisted adopting practice/case management