THE ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN POLITICAL PARTICIPATION by ZENCHA LILY NKEMPU

THE ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN POLITICALtool through which citizens can get properly informed.
PARTICIPATION AND POLITICAL KNOWLEDGESince knowledge is not just the pieces of information
 a person has but the ability to connect such pieces,
Howard Dean broke new grounds during the 2004the newspaper provides the best means to get
presidential campaign in the USA when he came upconnected pieces of information.
with the internet site he called "THE BLOG FORBesides, since all the information on the internet is
AMERICA-HOWARD DEANS 2004 CALL TO ACTIONnot provided in one huge block, readers are given the
WEBLOG". The blog which propelled Howard to thechoice to log on to the sites themselves for
front-lines in the presidential campaigns was designedinformation. This has often led to selective exposure
to act as a forum where citizens could get informedas most persons are likely to go for sites that write
and involved. According to Kerbel and Bloom, Finallypositively or are owned by the persons they support
informing the electorate­? How the internet gotin the political process. This distorts the citizen’s
people thinking about presidential politics in 2004, theawareness as concerns opposing parties and while
blog contributors raised topics they believed to beone could have an in-depth knowledge on one of the
important for the campaign to the citizens. And thecandidates for the elections, the same person could
citizens read, commented and shared opinions on thebe totally lacking in information about the other
site. This was something difficult if not impossiblecandidates.
with traditional media. The site which was used as aMoreover, the 2004 Pew campaign data revealed
social space by contributors was maintained by amost citizens as saying that television is their main
team tied to the Howard Dean campaign.source of political information and they use the
The call to action weblog was used to raise funds forinternet as a compliment to other news sources.
the campaign, organize social events, voice opinions,According to the research, 99% of the respondents
and criticize Howard’s stands on salient issues.admitted using other media aside the internet as
 means of information.
Though Howard Dean did not succeed in winning theFurther research however reveal that the internet is
fight for the Presidency in 2004, he certainly left avital in getting young persons to get active in the
legacy that was going to help reshape Presidentialelections through opinion sharing which gives them
campaign in the United States of America andthe feeling of importance thus pushing them to the
perhaps all over the world. Barrack Obama and Johnpoles.
McCain both made use of weblogs during their 
campaigns. However, Obama recorded more success CRITIC
in his use than his opponent did. Obama’s,All the researchers here tend to look at the internet
Change We can Believe In, blog was designed withas an ideal house for information. They tend to look
the same features as Howards. The blog providedat citizens as rational enough to log into the proper
day to day information on happenings in thesites for news and information on what is important
campaign, forums to meet other activist, possibilitiesto them. But the ease of access to the internet and
for comments and opinions. Obama made it possiblethe ability of just about anybody to post articles into
for people to propose policies and over 15000internet sites has tended to distort the fairness of
proposals have been got so far. Raising funds for thethe information. Aside original internet news sources,
campaign was one of the highs of the blog and theother sites owned by private individuals are accessed
mechanism to contact friends via email and landlineson a daily basis and this cannot hold as reliable
to inform them of the site or some new eventsources of information even on issues as minimal as
helped expand the site. The campaign managersthe biography of the presidential candidates. This
made it their duty to answer all false rumours orgoes to say the there is a lot of distorted
misunderstanding by the mainstream media so as toinformation on the internet that could make the new
set the records straight for the citizens.media a kind of dangerous tool for information
While using the blog, Scheufele (2007) posits thatgathering.
Obama made his campaign alive on twitter. Facebook,Moreover, I agree with the idea that there is a lot of
youtube and even via the use of sms. The use ofselective perception done on the internet. People will
these weblog and other internet facilities seemed togo for information that gives them mental comfort.
have acted as the contributing factor to the successObama fans will easily log into the internet and
of what has been called the Obama internetaccess his campaign site rather than trying that of
campaign. Using the youtube, myspace, facebook andMcCain. This makes the other media very important.
other highly rated internet facilities enabled severalEven though there is selective exposure on other
millions of Americans to get involved in the elections.media, it cannot really be as serious as it is with the
Young people were able to meet and talk about theinternet when people make a choice of the
election with other people via these interactive sitesinformation they want to see. Television on its part
and learn bout the campaign from the candidatestends to force its choice on the audience instead
themselves. Kerbel and Bloom () reveal that this gotsince they are never sure of what will be in the
several persons especially the young involved in thenewscasts.
elections and gave them the possibility to contactThe ability to participate and share opinions via the
others and persuade them to get involved. Writinginternet is also proven to be an important tool to
later in 2007, Dietrem Schefele, Understanding thevoter turn-out and even political participation. When
mechanism underlying political participation ….andpeople are made to think that their opinions count,
why it matters,2007,  brought out some surprisingthey definitely will want to live up to that pride by
but yet interesting revelation from research on theparticipating in the general elections.
2004 presidential elections in 2004.  During theBesides, since the internet provides citizens with very
campaign season, young persons between the agesheterogeneous discussion networks, it is easy for
of 18 – 29 said the elections were the mostpeople to access the opinions of others in order to
important elections in their live time but less thanshape or reshape their own opinions. Scheufele
50% of persons in this age bracket voted during the(2007) says talking helps, thus interacting with other
final elections. Initially rating it as important definitelycitizens will help to increase knowledge acquisition and
resulted from their ability to participate and sharepossibly participation.
opinions via the internet. But the candidates needed 
more than a weblog to get young people toTo conclude, it has largely been proven that the
participate. The birth of the youtube in 2005 and theinternet or the new media as it has come to be
arrival of other fun sites for young persons likecalled has impacted a lot on the way people gather
facebook, twitter, myspace was going to be theinformation and participate in political issues. Evolving
solution Obama and his opponents needed to getfrom internet blogging, all the features on the
more people involved in the 2008 Presidentialinternet have finally been involved in the political
elections.process. Since earlier research showed that youths
 are less involved in politics and in other matters of
 public concern, the target of politicians is largely tilting
 towards them leading to the use of this new media.
CAN THE INTERNET THEN STAND AS IDEALHowever, the internet cannot stand alone as the ideal
Kerbel and Bloom, “Blog for America and Civicsource for information. It has been proven as unable
involvement”, 2005 seem to conclude that theto sustain recallable factual knowledge. This may
internet and the use of the weblog was aexplain why the Obama campaign used several
contributing factor to political knowledge in the 2004tactics aside the internet to get to their audience. He
Presidential elections in the USA. While agreeing withis even reported to have used computer games as
him, Perlmutter in “Political blogging and Campaignpart of his campaign to invite young people to take
2008. A roundtable” (2008) adds that thevote. Since the internet has finally moved into the
internet was the cause of increased participation inplanning halls of all political candidates in the USA, is
the 2008 Presidential elections thanks tothere a possibility that the same will prove successful
Obama’s expansive and wise use of internetfor candidates in other parts of the world.
resources. Over 70 million Americans are said to use 
the internet on a daily basis and the young people 
are much more available on this media than the olderREFERENCES
generation – some of which do not know how to1. Matthew R. Kerbel and Joel David Bloom: “Blog
use the internet.for America and Civic Involvement”. The
But according to Kajsa and scheufele (2005), theInternational Journal of Press/Politics 2005; 10; 3
internet could be a good source of information for     2.  Kajsa E. Dalrymple and Dietram A.
citizens during presidential elections but there areScheufele: “Finally Informing the Electorate? How
some potholes that have required that the newthe Internet Got People Thinking about Presidential
media be used with traditional media in order to getPolitics in 2004”. The International Journal of
more effective results.Press/Politics 2007; 12; 96
Research has consistently shown the print media to    3.  David D. Perlmutter: “Political Blogging
have an effect on the amount of knowledge thatand Campaign 2008: A Roundtable”
citizens are able to make out of events. The printThe International Journal of Press/Politics 2008; 13;
media seems to offer more in-depth coverage of160
news thus permitting the ordinary citizen to in one4. Dietrum Scheufele. “ Understanding the
seating get a whole block of information thusmechanisms for the underlying political
accounts for factual recall knowledge by the citizens.participation….and why it matters” (2007)
This leaves the print media with still much effect as a5. www. Callmetaft.wikidot.